Freeforms clarification post #1

[lailah_tov]

Hello, friendly local freeforms tagmod here! Thanks for keeping your kink tags sex-related and not too elaborate and scenario-like. We have just a few notes, rejections, and queries.

General Notes

In keeping with S4S tradition, if you don't categorize your tags, we won't either.

Please use "Omegaverse" or "A/O/B" for omegaverse tags.

Rejections

pussy slapping: rejected because we already have Impact - Pussy Spanking

"Just The Tip" Sex To Tease Character Who Wants To Put The Whole Thing In: rejected because we already have "Just the tip" sex to tease character who wants the whole dick rephrased as "Just The Tip" Sex To Tease Penetrating Character Who Wants To Put The Whole Thing In

mask kink: rejected because we already have Clothing - mask kink

If you feel strongly that a rejected nomination should be included anyway, please comment and let us know how it differs from what's already in the tagset.

Queries

Consciously immobile to be used as fucktoy: can you clarify whether you mean the character is conscious while immobilized or deliberately choosing to be immobilized (maybe in contrast to the existing Rendered immobile to be used as fuck toy tag, which implies nonconsensual immobilization)?

doll kink: can you clarify whether you mean a kink for dolls or a kink for treating someone/being treated as a doll? If the latter, we already have Objectification - Aroused by being treated and/or dressed as a Doll or Plushie; will that suffice?

Comments

[sylvertongue]

Hiya, I nommed Michael | The Distortion/Jon Sims in The Magnus Archives, but it's gone through as Michael/Jon Sims.

There are, oh my god, so many Michaels in this canon it's a running joke. Could you please restore The Distortion to the nom?

Thank you so much!

[smut4smutmod]

That's fixed now! Sorry about that - there are a LOT of nominations with completely unnecessary and/or confusing pipes in the tag (though we specifically asked for pipes to be avoided) and sorting out which ones are actually necessary is not the easiest thing in the world, unfortunately! Always happy to add them back in if we get one wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

Doesn't the character in "Just The Tip" Sex To Tease Character Who Wants To Put The Whole Thing In refer to the top, so it's the opposite of the existing tag where the bottom is the one being teased?

[lailah_tov]

Oh, hm! I see what you mean. I'll put in a tag that makes it clearer and edit the post to reflect that. Thanks!

[skazka]

I'm the nominator for that tag and yep, my bad, that's what I meant -- for a scenario where the penetrating party is the one being teased, rather than the party who's receiving. I'm down for any kind of rephrase that makes that clearer.

typo in an accepted tag

[(Anonymous)]

I submitted "Catgirl Burglar/Her Pixie Accomplice (Original F/M)" in Original F/F, and it was accepted into Original F/F even with the incorrect F/M categorization appended to the tag. If it could be corrected to "Catgirl Burglar/Her Pixie Accomplice (Original F/F)" that would be good.

Thank you, and I'm very sorry I didn't catch the typo before the tag was accepted.

Re: typo in an accepted tag

[smut4smutmod]

No problem, that should be fixed now!

[audenrain]

hi, i’m the nominator for “Consciously immobile to be used as fucktoy” - yes, I meant choosing to be immobile/limp (in contrast to the other tag you mentioned, which implies less consensual activity). happy to rephrase! i wasn’t sure how to word it😅

[lailah_tov]

How about "Willingly immobilized to be used as a fucktoy"?

[audenrain]

sure, that works! :) thank you!

[(Anonymous)]

in the high potential fandom, daphne forrester/lev osman is the tagged pairing but the character's name is actually lev ozdil.